Which case law prohibits the use of warning shots?

The correct answer is Jones v. Wittenberg University, which specifically addresses the prohibition of warning shots in the context of the use of deadly force. This case established important guidelines regarding the use of firearms by law enforcement and emphasizes the importance of using deadly force only when absolutely necessary. The ruling from this case indicates that warning shots can be ineffective, dangerous, and may escalate a situation unnecessarily.

Additionally, it is important to recognize that the other cases listed pertain to different aspects of law enforcement protocols and rights. For instance, Miranda v. Arizona relates to the rights of individuals in custody and the necessity of informing them of those rights. Tennessee v. Garner deals with the use of deadly force in the apprehension of felons, particularly emphasizing the standard of necessity. Graham v. Connor addresses the use of reasonable force in making an arrest, which focuses on the objective standard of what a reasonable officer would consider under the circumstances. Each of these cases contributes to the understanding of law enforcement practices, but none specifically encompass the prohibition of warning shots as clearly as Jones v. Wittenberg University does.